Last time, we considered the Chain Rule for derivatives. This time, we’ll look at the product and quotient rules, focusing on how to keep the formulas straight, and make them easier to apply. We’ll look primarily at the quotient rule to start with, and then examine the product rule at the end.
Having recently helped some students (in person) with the rules of differentiation, I’m reminded to do so here, starting with the chain rule. It is easy to make this topic look harder than it really is; the two main ways to state the rule are often confusing, and different approaches fit different problems. We’ll try …
I am always interested in problems that can be solved in different ways, particularly because this can give a student a chance to be creative, as well as learning from experience that you don’t have to do it “the teacher’s way”. Here we’ll use trigonometry, and two different ways to add lines to a figure …
Last week’s discussion reminded me of another question, from July, about a probability problem that was solved in a hard (but educational) way and an easy way. This instance is more extreme, and, due to its length, requires extreme editing in order to fit here.
Sometimes there are several ways a problem could be solved, and we encourage students to pursue the path they’ve started on, rather than give them a method that may not be natural to them. (And we encourage them to start, if they haven’t yet, in part so we can see what might be most helpful …
A recent question about two interpretations of the range of a data set in statistics leads us into some older questions and some mysteries. Is “range” defined as the interval containing the data, or the difference between largest and smallest values, or 1 more than that? Yes! All three are used, and are useful.
Some time ago we looked into the meaning of histograms, on the way to the concept of the Probability Density Function. A recent question focused on the histogram itself, in a way that will add to that discussion. We’ll learn about frequency density, which was overlooked there, and discover an alternative way to label a …
I’ve had several occasions in face-to-face tutoring lately to refer to a past post on mixing (that is, composition) of trig and inverse trig functions. Several recent questions have touched directly or indirectly on this same general idea and extended it, so I thought I’d post them.
Having looked at issues surrounding powers and roots of complex numbers, including fractional powers, let’s go even further and consider complex powers of complex bases. Things will get a little weird as we work toward \((2+3i)^{3+2i}\)!
Last time, we looked at two recent questions about combining squares and roots, and implications for the properties of exponents. We didn’t have space for some older questions that we referred to. Here, we will go there.